?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Law and Order: SVU season 7, episode 15, “Manipulated,” is the gift that keeps on giving. Every time I think about it, I discover more reasons to ferociously criticize its portrayal of people with disabilities. [Here’s my plot summary of the ep if you haven’t read it. http://blogofstench.livejournal.com/511983.html And here’s the first part of my discussion of the depiction of people with disabilities in the ep. http://blogofstench.livejournal.com/512150.html ] Here are some more wretched stereotypes that the show supports:

 

1. People with disabilities do not have active, fulfilling sex lives. Linus props up this statement with his claim that he hasn’t had sex with Tessa “since the accident” three years ago. His statement directly connects a lack of satisfying sex and the beginning of Tessa’s disability, thus portraying Tessa as a woman with a disability who can apparently never have sex again.

Later in the ep, Tessa elaborates on Linus’ dire scenario, saying that oral sex [her on him] “is the only way [they] have to be intimate.” Of all the possible sexual activities in the world, Tessa has apparently been limited to one because of her disability. Because she is apparently limited to one activity and because that activity does not entail Linus pleasuring Tessa, the implication is that Tessa’s sex life is circumscribed and miserable.

2. People with disabilities are pitiable because they suffer constantly. Linus apparently believes this; in the final scene, he says to Benson and Stabler that his wife Tessa “is a victim. You have no idea what it’s like for her. Her neurologists say she’s in constant pain.” In Linus’ view, Tessa’s constant pain takes her out of control of her own life and makes her a “victim,” a low-status entity to be regarded with condescension and pity.

Not only does Linus believe that Tessa is deserving of sympathy and pity, but the show seems to suggest this as well. More precisely, the show believes that Tessa is pathetic, which is to say contemptible, because of her physical and mental suffering. When Tessa’s lawyer hands Novak a “not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect” paper, she describes her client, in a pat-the-little-fellow-on-the-head voice, as “a very sick woman…who is not competent to stand trial.” Furthermore, Tessa’s final words – “What will happen to me now? Who will take care of me?” – are clearly constructed to make her sound whiny, desolate and abandoned, that is, deserving of a certain revolted pity, because of her physical and mental conditions.

 

Profile

blogofstench
Blog of Eternal Stench
Love Has Fangs

Latest Month

March 2015
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow